You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The rewards are not fixed per week, perhaps we can get the average instead?
The rewards' value doesn't match the role - would be more accurate if the working group name is written
eg. Council member → Council, Content Curator → Content Working Group, and so on
Chat with Integrator is from testnet. Maybe we can change it to something like Explore current openings here and add the info below the heading. Another option is Chat with a community support with the Discord invite link embedded.
The number of workers in the working groups is too high.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for flagging these, here are my thoughts them:
That value is a weekly approximation based off of the rewardPerBlock associated with the worker. Are the current values egregiously wrong?
The reason we don't here is because of the space constraints, we were very careful to pick names that fit within the design.
Similar to the 2nd point, it'd be difficult to make any radical changes without new designs. I imagine we could change it to something like "Chat with support" if that is better?
I will investigate and fix this 👍 (Edit: This is now fixed.)
Suggestions:
eg. Council member → Council, Content Curator → Content Working Group, and so on
Chat with Integrator
is from testnet. Maybe we can change it to something like Explore current openings here and add the info below the heading. Another option isChat with a community support
with the Discord invite link embedded.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: