Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WGs: worker "job title" #4833

Open
mochet opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

WGs: worker "job title" #4833

mochet opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mochet
Copy link
Collaborator

mochet commented Apr 16, 2024

Past work

Problem

  • Currently, when viewing a working group within Pioneer, there is no actual designation of a "job title". Although this is not a significant priority right now, I feel that Pioneer should be able to communicate to visitors what the general structure of a working group is--this can communicate to investors and others the organized nature of the DAO and project in general, whereas the current flat structure with a lack of titles does not achieve this.
  • Even within the DAO's own users it is sometimes tedious to figure out what specific workers do.
  • You can technically figure out what a "job title" is by clicking through a few layers and figure out what application a worker applied for but this is insufficient.

Solution

  1. Have a form that uses a metaprotocol where the lead can designate the "job title" of a worker--although it is technically possible to derive a worker's "job title" from the opening that they applied for, the "job title" will likely change slightly over time for long term workers.
  2. Show the "job title" next to the worker on the WG pages.

Example

This is from a recent Content Curator WG's report, and you can see how having "job titles" gives a lot more structure to things.
image

@mochet mochet added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant