Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think your idea is amazing. I didn't have time to take a deep look in AeroVector so far, but I think it is time to consider it. @MateusStano and @giovaniceotto , tagging you here too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm a hoby model rocket maker and programmer (midsize). I build and fly some rockets.
There are some shortcomings to make this hobby safer and better.
There are some open source or free applications in the market (OpenRocket, Rasaero II etc.)
But each of these simulations has a problem. In Openrocket and Rasaero, there is no plugin for active stabilization. Also, OpenRocket seems to be confident in subsonic flights.
I did some research on the problem. I found the Aerovector application written in python. It seems to be a well-made application, but there are a few problems here. Airfoils cannot be drawn as desired in supersonic flights and airfoil structures.
This code needs some improvement. I'll try to make some attempts but my python experience on this is pretty low.
My suggestion is that an optimized application can be created with the partnership of rocketpy and aerovector.
I don't know if anyone will agree with this idea or not.
Best regards
Alvise
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions