Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Low validation DSC when training on Brats2018 #28

Open
MohammedAdelFahmi opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Low validation DSC when training on Brats2018 #28

MohammedAdelFahmi opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@MohammedAdelFahmi
Copy link

Hello, First of all, thanks for the amazing work.
Question: I tried to train the Unet3D model on bratS 2018 dataset using the 'train_brats_2018_new.py'. but I got lower validation DSC and higher validation loss, I think the model is facing some trouble on validation set:
image

@MohammedAdelFahmi
Copy link
Author

@black0017

@yeshunlong
Copy link

Same problem, how to fix it?
In other words, what is the best args for every model and dataset?

@Gold3nk
Copy link

Gold3nk commented Sep 11, 2023

I have also encountered the same issue. When training on the brats2018 and brats2019 datasets, the dice scores of the validation set consistently converge to slightly above 60, which is significantly lower than the dice scores of the training set.
It seems that the inference code is incomplete as well. After attempting to fix it, I found that my dice score for the inference results is around 89, which seems incorrect because there shouldn't be such a large gap between the dice scores of my test set and training set, both of which come from the official training sets of brats2018 and brats2019. Due to my limited coding abilities, I had to abandon this code repository.

@WindymanJOX
Copy link

WindymanJOX commented Jun 7, 2024

I think there is no proper DSC function for BratTS dataset in this repository. BratTS aims to seg WT, TC and ET, there are overlapping regions among those 3 areas, that is saying we should calculate the aboved 3 DSCs to show the performance of our trained model. But in this repo, they just put a general DSC func to all seg tasks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants