Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project Support #41

Open
jeffutter opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Project Support #41

jeffutter opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@jeffutter
Copy link

Hi @lexmag ,

I was wondering if this project could use some additional help with support and maintenance. It looks like there have been no releases for a while and not much activity on the repo even with a handful of open PRs.

We use this library in a few projects at Bleacher Report and would be glad to help out where we can.

I would be in support of adding another maintainer or two, or moving the repo to an organization. Feel free to let me know how I can help or use this thread to discuss further.

@sb8244
Copy link

sb8244 commented Jun 21, 2019

I'd be happy to help out here as well.

@mroach
Copy link

mroach commented Jun 25, 2019

@jeffutter Thanks for bringing this up. With issues like #42 that break Statix on the newest OTP, it's becoming more pressing to keep the project maintained. Otherwise, I suspect there will be lots of forking to patch it. It'd be handy to at a "fork of truth" that's maintained until this question is resolved. I'd wager that Bleacher Report would be a good candidate for that fork. Do you have one shared publicly?

@jeffutter
Copy link
Author

@mroach We don't have our own fork. We're either using the hex release or https://github.com/rodrigues/statix/tree/events_checks. However, I can create a fork under our org that includes event_checks and fixes for Erlang 21.3.8.4. If that would be helpful, I can probably do that in the next couple of days.

@sb8244
Copy link

sb8244 commented Jun 25, 2019

My biggest concern with a fork is how it will handle inclusion in Instruments package. We'll need to probably keep the statix package name and set override: true in order to get it working there.

@mroach
Copy link

mroach commented Jun 27, 2019

@jeffutter That'd be great to have a fork on the Bleacher Report org. Since statix is now broken, I think we'll see a ramp-up in users looking for a maintained package as they upgrade.

@jeffutter
Copy link
Author

I've created a fork over at https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix that has a couple of commits merged in that we use. I also have a branch that fixes OTP-21.3.8.4 here: https://github.com/bleacherreport/statix/tree/otp-21.3.8.4-support I think it works, but it probably needs some cleanup and testing.

@lexmag
Copy link
Owner

lexmag commented Jun 29, 2019

Hi folks,

I apologise for not responding faster.
I'll put as much as possible time during coming week to make PR merged and issues closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants