Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.js data to .csv #87

Open
Sanix-Darker opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

.js data to .csv #87

Sanix-Darker opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@Sanix-Darker
Copy link
Contributor

Sanix-Darker commented Sep 11, 2023

Migrate the way datas are saved on js code to a more readable and simple format like .csv

EDIT:

Originally idea from : https://x.com/ln_dev7/status/1701336511365496973?s=20

@gabin-dongmo
Copy link
Contributor

gabin-dongmo commented Sep 12, 2023

A json file is probably more suitable.

Also, regarding the roadmap of this app, do you also consider adding a backend or a data access layer? @ln-dev7

@Sanix-Darker
Copy link
Contributor Author

A json file is probably more suitable.

and why that ?

@gabin-dongmo
Copy link
Contributor

A json file is probably more suitable.

and why that ?

It's the most adopted format I believe. Obviously, it's a matter of collective deciding. Either way is fine IMHO.

@Sanix-Darker
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's the most adopted format I believe

this doesn't answer the question on "why the .json format is more suitable", sorry !
But yeah, of course it's a matter of collective deciding, and this issue it's a proposal after all,


To see from where this issue is originated, please check : https://x.com/ln_dev7/status/1701336511365496973?s=20

@gabin-dongmo
Copy link
Contributor

More suitable in the sense that most developers tend to use it (by convention) as storage format. Ultimately, it doesn't matter which format is chosen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants