-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
News: OpenWrt One WiFi 6 router board #424
Comments
Here is an iperf3 test with my little WiFi 6 router that uses the same SoC as OpenWRT One:
My client system has a PCIe card with a mt7922 chip in it. Channel is 116. Channel width is 160. Yup, wireless faster than 1 Gb ethernet. |
Here is a ping test with my little WiFi 6 router that uses the same SoC as OpenWRT One:
|
Yeah, that's hot stuff. Thanks for the heads up, looks like something I'd
be interested in. Love me some custom Openwrt hardware where I don't have
to fight a poorly designed USB 3 bus on my RPis.
…On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 8:02 PM morrownr ***@***.***> wrote:
Here is a ping test with my little WiFi 6 router that uses the same SoC as
OpenWRT One:
$ ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.663 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.658 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.665 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=9.83 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.734 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=5.53 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.656 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.696 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.674 ms
...
Average ping time: 4.803
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#424 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACSLA2BJOIDHYJLL5Q6TMDTY7MIODAVCNFSM6AAAAABGTQNHGSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBQGMZTMMRTG4>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
How is it going? I get what you are saying. The RasPi's are fun but some of the hardware choices have made for challenges. I follow OpenWRTm especially if I am looking for something new. By last fall, I had keyed in on the SoC and found a router that would get the job done. Mine is more limited than the one Banana Pt and OpenWRT are building but it does get the job done and I am surprised how stable it is. When you look at OpenWRT One, they have added some very handy capabilities that I have never seen in a home router... clock with battery back-up. What? It is designed to be opened up. In fact, I think you have to buy the board, the case and a power supply separately and put it together yourself... kinda like a Pi. |
Things are good. How are things w/you?
I'm still messing about with these routers, built a unique one from a 4g/5g
Waveshare RPi CM4 carrier board but replaced the m.2 4g/5g cell module with
an m.2 Alfa AWM27921U (USB bus) from Rockland. It's a very unique card
imo..
I'm sold. Designed to be built/opened up, count me in. The RTC with battery
backup is rare.. the Waveshare carrier board i used has it interestingly
enough, but you also have to have an RPi CM4 as opposed to the Openwrt
offering.. I'm looking forward to hearing more.
…On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 8:19 PM morrownr ***@***.***> wrote:
@amisix <https://github.com/amisix>
How is it going? I get what you are saying. The RasPi's are fun but some
of the hardware choices have made for challenges.
I follow OpenWRTm especially if I am looking for something new. By last
fall, I had keyed in on the SoC and found a router that would get the job
done. Mine is more limited than the one Banana Pt and OpenWRT are building
but it does get the job done and I am surprised how stable it is. When you
look at OpenWRT One, they have added some very handy capabilities that I
have never seen in a home router... clock with battery back-up. What? It is
designed to be opened up. In fact, I think you have to buy the board, the
case and a power supply separately and put it together yourself... kinda
like a Pi.
@morrownr <https://github.com/morrownr>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#424 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACSLA2AD5WMCUJB6HGONDADY7MKMDAVCNFSM6AAAAABGTQNHGSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBQGM2DANJYGY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Things are going slow here, Hopefully things improve.
You always have interesting things going. I'm looking forward to hearing more about this board as well. I hope this project is a success and they follow on with a tri band WiFi 7 board. |
My tests on RPi4B is showing me horrible experience with the USB3, I cannot imagine how bad it is, now when I need USB I just go to use my NanoPi R4S.
These days BananaPi is doing a lot Mediatek related products, I also have their BPI-R4 (yeah I need 10Gbps) and the spec is really good. The OpenWrt One is interesting but I had enough MT7981 based device (GL-INET MT3000 I liked most) so I would probably skip this one, however if the price is OK I would recommend it to friends. |
Earlier this year I learned that Banana Pi and OpenWRT were teaming up to release a low cost wifi 6 router. The board is designed by OpenWRT and will be producted and marketed by Banana Pi. Here is an article to update us on the status:
https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/04/17/first-openwrt-one-router-board-samples-auction-openwrt-summit/
My WiFi 6 router is based on the MediaTek MT7981B SoC. I run OpenWRT on it. It works well. OpenWRT One will have several cool features that mine does not have.
@morrownr
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: