Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I don't think a license would force anyone to contribute back (even though it would be required). I used AGPL in the past (ce863f0) but ended up changing it to GPL, don't remember exactly why. I'm interested in hearing from others what are their opinions on this (specially who downvoted it, @Igorgro?) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Exactly) Moreover, the change of license often cause a lot of controversies in the community, so it is better to keep this as it is unless there are any major need. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This is an application that provides service over network, and using GPL is probably not going to help pushing commercial users to contribute back. I guess it makes more sense for it to be licensed in AGPL?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions