Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Actually, let me generalize this. I never liked how many things we've thrown into the
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
No, not the only one. I agree that more granular groupings are better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 Even so more than now most applications like gnome-shell run fine under wayland with no X.org running. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Quick update regarding this: With the merge of #13618, the group in question has been renamed to In my spare time I’ve been working on deaggregating this group, with the current plan being to have a separate group for each DE/WM/Compositor (so GNOME will be it’s own group, KDE will be it’s own group, XFCE will be it’s own group, Sway will be it’s own group, etc), as well as putting the web browsers in their own group, and (probably) having a separate group just covering the X server (independent of the other GUI stuff). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
gnome-shell
on a default ubuntu installation can take a significant amount of memory. See what happens to the X application group, if we add an additional line/dimension forgnome-shell
So any reason not to change the default config and show it as a separate dimension?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions