Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note tradeoffs of different communication protocol types #6

Open
Frijol opened this issue Feb 5, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Note tradeoffs of different communication protocol types #6

Frijol opened this issue Feb 5, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@Frijol
Copy link
Member

Frijol commented Feb 5, 2017

Wifi vs BLE vs 6LoWPAN

@tcr
Copy link
Member

tcr commented Feb 5, 2017

This should ultimatley go in the SPEC: https://github.com/tessel/reach-wg/blob/master/SPEC.md#radio

We should be clear about what the benefit of "user-friendly" protocols like BLE and Wifi are. We aren't rehashing the argument of "should we pick 6LoWPaN?", instead we are detailing why a protocol is an appropriate or inappropriate choice for Reach (based off Reach's goals)

@Frijol
Copy link
Member Author

Frijol commented Feb 5, 2017

Might just go in archival notes, honestly– seems like an appendix sort of thing

@nodebotanist
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with @Frijol

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants