Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: LEAP-1090: django 4.2 upgrade (WIP) #5896

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jombooth
Copy link
Contributor

PR fulfills these requirements

  • Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
  • Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
  • Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

  • Product design
  • Backend (Database)
  • Backend (API)
  • Frontend

Describe the reason for change

(link to issue, supportive screenshots etc.)

What does this fix?

(if this is a bug fix)

What is the new behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What is the current behavior?

(if this is a breaking or feature change)

What libraries were added/updated?

(list all with version changes)

Does this change affect performance?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

Does this change affect security?

(if so describe the impacts positive or negative)

What alternative approaches were there?

(briefly list any if applicable)

What feature flags were used to cover this change?

(briefly list any if applicable)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

(check only one)

  • Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
  • Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
  • No
  • Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)

What level of testing was included in the change?

(check all that apply)

  • e2e
  • integration
  • unit

Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?

(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label May 17, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 556b3f3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/6658b07bb28a48000864fcaa

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 556b3f3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/6658b07b31382700088e5c31

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.96%. Comparing base (c7b4b98) to head (7764798).
Report is 22 commits behind head on develop.

Current head 7764798 differs from pull request most recent head 556b3f3

Please upload reports for the commit 556b3f3 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #5896   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    75.96%   75.96%           
========================================
  Files          159      159           
  Lines        13385    13385           
========================================
  Hits         10168    10168           
  Misses        3217     3217           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 75.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant