-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor #29997
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. ConflictsNo conflicts as of last run. |
Concept ACK |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review ACK fadb3eb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK fadb3eb
Can't think of any situations where index-based is preferable over key-based, so this seems like a nice cleanup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, left my nits on the wrong PR. Nothing blocking, only if you re-touch.
fadb3eb
to
fa3169b
Compare
re-ACK fa3169b, addressed doc nits |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review ACK fa3169b. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements
The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it.