add podman-clean-transient.service service to rootless mode #22749
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: jkwiatko <jkwiatkoski@protonmail.com>
JayKayy
changed the title
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
Sure, LGTM. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JayKayy, Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit c8dc5c7
into
containers:main
89 of 91 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
This PR adds the podman-clean-transient.service to the list of installed user services. According to the issue #22317 there should be no reason this would not work in user mode. This seems like it was just forgotten in the original PR: #16892
Closes #22317