Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sc 9354/idp regional merge nucliadb predict and processing #2145

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

drf7
Copy link
Contributor

@drf7 drf7 commented May 14, 2024

Description

Describe the proposed changes made in this PR.

How was this PR tested?

Describe how you tested this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

license-eye has totally checked 966 files.

Valid Invalid Ignored Fixed
860 8 98 0
Click to see the invalid file list
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/kb_usage_report.py

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark

Benchmark suite Current: 033555b Previous: 3f27502 Ratio
nucliadb/search/tests/unit/search/test_fetch.py::test_highligh_error 13029.001128721698 iter/sec (stddev: 4.168134176542238e-7) 12969.375444792455 iter/sec (stddev: 1.9097610071932152e-7) 1.00

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

license-eye has totally checked 972 files.

Valid Invalid Ignored Fixed
866 8 98 0
Click to see the invalid file list
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/kb_usage_report.py

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

license-eye has totally checked 972 files.

Valid Invalid Ignored Fixed
866 8 98 0
Click to see the invalid file list
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/kb_usage_report.py

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.01%. Comparing base (994c437) to head (bfc714b).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Current head bfc714b differs from pull request most recent head 033555b

Please upload reports for the commit 033555b to get more accurate results.

Files Patch % Lines
nucliadb/nucliadb/ingest/consumer/materializer.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2145      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.22%   75.01%   -1.22%     
==========================================
  Files          90       80      -10     
  Lines        6251     5868     -383     
==========================================
- Hits         4765     4402     -363     
+ Misses       1486     1466      -20     
Flag Coverage Δ
ingest 70.44% <75.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
node-sidecar ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

license-eye has totally checked 972 files.

Valid Invalid Ignored Fixed
866 8 98 0
Click to see the invalid file list
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/protos/kb_usage_pb2_grpc.pyi
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/init.py
  • nucliadb_utils/nucliadb_utils/nuclia_usage/utils/kb_usage_report.py

@drf7 drf7 marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2024 17:05
@drf7 drf7 requested a review from lferran May 22, 2024 09:43
@drf7 drf7 merged commit 8adfb25 into main May 23, 2024
86 checks passed
@drf7 drf7 deleted the sc-9354/idp-regional-merge-nucliadb-predict-and-processing branch May 23, 2024 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants